The statement is a critique of a specific news story published by The Guardian, comparing it unfavorably to other controversial pieces of journalism. The tone is highly critical and uses strong language to express disapproval. The intent appears to be to highlight perceived journalistic failures and to remind the public of the media's role in the treatment of Julian Assange. The content is focused on public issues related to media integrity and freedom of the press, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses harsh language ('unredacted horseshit') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it uses a personal attack on the credibility of the journalists involved, which violates the principle of avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to its inflammatory language, thus partially violating the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.