The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues related to veterans' health, FDA decisions, and the influence of the drug industry.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but implies harm by suggesting that the rejection of MDMA therapy is unjustified and influenced by ulterior motives.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others but indirectly accuses a fringe organization of harmful rhetoric, which could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for veterans by highlighting the perceived injustice in the rejection of MDMA therapy.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of the FDA advisory committee and the fringe organization but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of veterans' health and challenges the motives behind the rejection of MDMA therapy.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about an important public issue.