Jill Stien

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 99

The statement and accompanying image suggest that billionaires are influencing the democratic process by financially supporting a Super PAC aimed at re-electing Joe Biden. The tone is accusatory and implies a negative connotation towards the involvement of wealthy individuals in politics. The content raises concerns about transparency and the influence of money in politics, which are legitimate public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm individuals but implies unethical behavior, which could be harmful if unsubstantiated. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as an attack on the dignity of the individuals mentioned by implying they are 'buying' votes. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and divisive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without providing a platform for response or discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about the influence of money in politics, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by promoting transparency. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but should be careful to ensure that accusations are substantiated and not misleading.