Christo (FSD Supervisor)
@ThePlaidCons
·
581d
The statement engages in a discussion about the implications of a Supreme Court decision on media and platform regulation, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, suggesting potential future consequences of the decision.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Supreme Court decision and its supporters but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.