The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with the political debate between Biden and Trump, and advocate for the inclusion of another political voice. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to mobilize support and challenge the exclusion from the debate.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does use strong language ('sham debate') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue of exclusion rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for more voices in the debate, which aligns with democratic principles. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the debate process, though it uses strong language that could be seen as a personal attack on the debate organizers.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for broader representation in political debates, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by challenging the exclusion and advocating for more inclusive debates. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.