The statement and accompanying image promote a debate event featuring presidential candidates, suggesting that viewers will get a more authentic version of the election compared to mainstream media coverage. The tone is promotional and somewhat critical of CNN, implying that their version of the election is less genuine.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that CNN's coverage is misleading, which could contribute to distrust in media. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on promoting an event rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by encouraging viewers to watch the debate and form their own opinions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather implies criticism of CNN without detailed reasoning. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote an event that could contribute to public understanding of the election, which can be seen as a positive use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by promoting an alternative debate, but the implication that CNN's coverage is not genuine could be seen as lacking integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.