Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a Supreme Court decision and its implications on state communications and misinformation. The tone is appreciative and supportive of a commentator's analysis, and it addresses a significant legal and societal issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a respectful acknowledgment of another's commentary. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a commentary on a legal decision, which can foster informed public dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the content of the commentary and the court's decision. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.