The statement addresses a significant public issue—geoengineering and its potential impacts on climate change. It calls for scrutiny of large, untested policy ideas, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for careful scrutiny of geoengineering schemes, which could have unintended negative consequences. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for more studies and scrutiny, fostering a more informed public debate. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by calling for intense scrutiny rather than dismissing geoengineering outright or attacking its proponents. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for responsible policy-making, which could benefit society by preventing potential negative consequences of untested geoengineering schemes. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using its platform to raise awareness about the potential risks of geoengineering. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.