Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
579d
The statement critiques the language used in a legal decision, suggesting that the principle of standing to sue is only recognized if it can be measured financially. This engages with public issues related to legal principles and government accountability, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of a legal principle rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived issue with how legal principles are applied. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a legal decision without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.