Cornel West

Rank 6 of 47
|
Score 306

The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with the issue of ballot access and democratic participation, which are significant public concerns. The tone is assertive and calls for action, aiming to mobilize support for a political campaign.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for democratic participation and justice, which are generally positive goals. However, the accusatory tone towards the NC Board of Elections and the Democrats could be seen as confrontational. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. It focuses on the issue of ballot access rather than targeting individuals. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of every vote counting and the need for justice in the electoral process. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific issue (ballot access) and calling for action. However, it could be seen as somewhat adversarial towards the NC Board of Elections and the Democrats. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to mobilize support for a political campaign, which can be seen as an effort to better society by advocating for democratic principles. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue, though the confrontational tone could be moderated for more constructive dialogue. [+1]