The statement expresses dissatisfaction with the current state of political debates, specifically criticizing the behavior of the participants and advocating for the inclusion of another candidate. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, aiming to provoke thought and possibly support for a different candidate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses dismissive language ('babble at and insult each other') which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does lack respect for the dignity of the individuals being criticized. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a dismissive tone and does not provide specific, constructive feedback. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a different candidate, which could be seen as an attempt to better the political landscape. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though the tone could be more respectful and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.