Joe Biden

The statement 'We were respected all over the world' in the context of a conversation about January 6 and linking to a website does constitute public discourse. It engages with a significant public issue, namely the events of January 6 and the perception of the United States on the global stage. The statement is attributed to Trump and is part of a conversation involving BidenHQ, indicating a political context.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the context of January 6 is sensitive and can be polarizing. It neither clearly adheres to nor violates this principle.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is neutral in this regard.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a declarative statement about respect, which can be seen as subjective and potentially divisive. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a broad assertion without supporting arguments or evidence, and it does not attack any individual directly.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement's influence is ambiguous. It could be seen as attempting to shape public perception of the events of January 6, but it does not clearly aim for the betterment of society. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not demonstrate responsible use of the platform. It is a broad, unsubstantiated claim that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]