The statement expresses frustration over being excluded from a debate stage, likely in the context of a political or public event. It uses hashtags to call for inclusion and to question the legitimacy of the debate without the speaker's participation. The tone is critical and implies a sense of unfairness or bias.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does express frustration and could be seen as accusatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes an accusatory remark without providing a basis for discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to voice a concern, but it could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than making an accusatory remark.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.