Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes CNN's moderation of a debate, suggesting it contributes to a broader trend toward fascism and compares CNN to Fox News. It also references a conversation about Joe Biden's policies on family separation and U.S. involvement in Latin American politics, indicating a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement uses strong language ('ratchet effect,' 'fascism') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the comparison to Fox News could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and critical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack by comparing CNN to Fox News. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about perceived issues in media moderation and political debates, which could be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.