Mike Johnson

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -80

The statement is assertive and partisan, expressing a strong opinion about the qualifications of a particular candidate in a presidential debate. It uses hyperbolic language to emphasize the perceived superiority of one candidate over others. The hashtag and image further align the statement with a specific political campaign.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the qualifications of other candidates without substantive evidence, potentially contributing to divisiveness. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of other candidates, as it implies they are unqualified without providing a constructive critique. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is dismissive and partisan. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a blanket assertion without engaging with the merits or policies of the other candidates. [-1]