Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement reports on a public protest related to U.S. foreign policy, specifically the demand to end U.S. aid to Israel. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue and thus constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is neutral and factual, reporting on an event without using harmful language or actions. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not targeting individuals. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values. It is neutral in this regard.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It simply reports on the event. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By reporting on a protest related to a significant public issue, the statement uses its influence to bring attention to a societal concern. It adheres to this principle. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by reporting on a public protest, and it uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. It adheres to this principle. [+1]