Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is critical of media figures and their portrayal of a public figure's mental fitness. It uses a confrontational tone and implies that the media has lost credibility. The statement engages with public issues, specifically media integrity and political discourse, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a confrontational tone and could contribute to divisiveness. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and could be seen as engaging in a form of harassment or hate speech against media figures. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a mocking tone and could be seen as a personal attack. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does exercise free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it is more inflammatory than constructive. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.