Jill Stien

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 60

The statement by Alex Wagner appears to be a critique of a public figure's performance in a debate, specifically focusing on the individual's age and perceived confusion. The tone is straightforward and critical.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as harmful because it highlights the individual's age and confusion in a potentially derogatory manner, which may contribute to ageism or negative stereotypes about older individuals. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual being critiqued, as it focuses on personal attributes (age and confusion) rather than the content of their arguments or performance. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement is critical, it does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it makes a personal observation that could be perceived as a personal attack. [-1]