The statement appears to be a reaction to a presidential debate, suggesting a critical view of the event and posing a provocative question about America's trajectory. The use of hashtags indicates an intention to engage in public discourse about a significant political event.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions, but the linked content would need to be evaluated to fully determine adherence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the linked content would need to be evaluated to fully determine adherence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement's tone is critical and provocative, which may not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but the linked content would need to be evaluated to fully determine adherence.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise a critical issue, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly, but the linked content would need to be evaluated to fully determine adherence.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.