Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques the narrative that concerns about President Biden's age are driven by media coverage rather than observable reality. It engages in public discourse by addressing a political issue and media influence on public perception.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mock the idea that media coverage is the primary reason for concerns about Biden's age.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses sarcasm and does not address the underlying issues in a constructive manner. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to critique media narratives, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.