Jill Stien

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 60

The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with the political debate surrounding the 2024 presidential election. The statement promotes a specific candidate while criticizing others, and it includes a call to action for donations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('Abandon Biden, Dump Trump') which could be seen as divisive and potentially harmful, thus not fully upholding the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of the term 'anti-genocide candidate' could be seen as inflammatory and disrespectful to the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the candidate it supports but does so at the expense of others, which does not fully align with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses dismissive language towards other candidates, which can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to promote a specific candidate, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society from the perspective of the candidate's supporters. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its divisive language.