The statement expresses a critical opinion about the exclusion of Jill Stein from the presidential debate, suggesting that her absence was a significant mistake and that the public deserves better representation. The tone is assertive and implies a call for more inclusive political discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of the debate's inclusivity.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for broader representation in political debates.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the issue of inclusivity.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a more inclusive and representative political process.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.