Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a significant public issue, specifically a Supreme Court ruling and its implications, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting bias and potential misconduct by a Supreme Court justice.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by accusing a public figure of corruption without definitive proof, potentially damaging reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Clarence Thomas, as it accuses him of unethical behavior based on gifts and payments. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a personal attack on Clarence Thomas. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no acknowledgment of potential mistakes or room for correction in the statement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a perceived injustice, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but it does so in a highly critical manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or maintain integrity, given the accusatory tone and lack of definitive proof. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.