Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement provides an analysis of the decline in TV viewership for a presidential debate, comparing it to previous years and offering reasons for the decline. It engages with public issues related to media consumption and political engagement, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is factual and analytical, thus adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing reasons for the decline in viewership, which can foster a better comprehension of media trends and public interest. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a public figure's comment with additional context and analysis. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public discussion with relevant information and analysis. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.