The statement 'That is what’s so infuriating. They created a wholly illegitimate candidate selection process' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive issue related to the democratic process and the legitimacy of candidate selection within a political party. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a perceived injustice in the political process.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized environment by using strong language like 'infuriating' and 'wholly illegitimate.' [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a process, which could indirectly affect the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration and criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a blanket condemnation without offering a path for resolution or improvement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible by not providing evidence or constructive suggestions. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.