In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
124d
The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues, specifically the performance of presidential candidates and the promotion of an alternative candidate. The tone is critical of the current political figures and promotes a different political option.
- The statement is critical but does not appear to use harmful language directly. However, it does imply that the current candidates are unfit, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but questions the dignity of the candidates by calling them unfit. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes an alternative political option, which can be seen as promoting understanding and offering a different perspective. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks beyond questioning the fitness of the candidates.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote a political alternative, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion and promoting an alternative candidate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.