New York Post
@nypost
·
115d
The statement is highly charged and accusatory, focusing on a specific incident to make broader claims about immigration policies and the current administration. It uses strong language and implies a direct causal relationship between the policies and the crime, which can be seen as inflammatory.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it generalizes a specific incident to make a broader political point, potentially inciting fear and prejudice against immigrants. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly the accused, who is presumed innocent until proven guilty. It also indirectly targets the administration and judiciary without constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a tragic incident to make a political argument, which can deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a personal attack on the administration and judiciary rather than addressing the policies in a reasoned manner. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to criticize the administration and judiciary but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.