Socialist Smurf
@SmurfLefty
·
575d
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about historical and ideological issues, specifically the Bolshevik project and its implications on society and human nature.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the term 'historically stupid/vicious' could be seen as harsh and potentially harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on the Bolsheviks, rather than focusing on constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, though the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.