In reply to:
GloriaVissy
@GloriaVissy
·
124d
The statement by @GloriaVissy and the subsequent reply by @NewsNation and the user linking to Jill Stein's platform constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about a political candidate's stance on issues, which is a public concern.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is neutral and informative. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to the candidate's platform, allowing others to learn more about her stance on issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a constructive response to a request for more information. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by encouraging informed decision-making among voters. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.