Bret Baier

Rank 20 of 47

Score 54

Reposted by Bret Baier

-8

The best advisors and management in the world can't mask the deterioration that Americans have seen. I think it's insulting for Biden's family and some supporters to blame the staff for this. Completely ludicrous. A galactic level of self-delusion and gaslighting.

Alex Thompson

@AlexThomp

557d

On Morning Joe--closely watched by Biden/his aides--Mika begins with a lengthy and flattering recounts of Biden's bio and overcoming adversity.

She also floats that staff changes may be needed and that their needs to be better "management" of his age/schedule.

7/1/2024, 10:46:11 AM

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the performance and management of President Biden and the discourse surrounding it. The tone is critical and dismissive, with strong language used to express disagreement with the idea that staff changes could address perceived issues with Biden's performance.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong, dismissive language ('insulting,' 'ludicrous,' 'galactic level of self-delusion and gaslighting') which could be seen as harmful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use dismissive language that could be seen as disrespectful to those it criticizes. This partially violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the views of others in a harsh manner. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it uses strong, dismissive language that could be seen as a personal attack on Biden's family and supporters. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to its dismissive and harsh tone. This partially violates the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]