Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques the media's handling of President Biden's perceived infirmity, suggesting that reporters ignored obvious signs due to White House influence. The tone is critical and implies a failure in journalistic integrity.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that the media's actions (or inactions) could have led to misinformation, which can be harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of the media and the White House without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the media and the White House, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to call for accountability in journalism. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.