The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically Amendment 4 in Florida, and calls for collective action to defeat it. The tone is critical and the intent is to persuade the audience against the amendment by highlighting perceived negative consequences.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing. It does not use inflammatory language, so it moderately adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others, adhering to this principle. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on rallying opposition, so it does not align with this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand, adhering to this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize action against a public policy, which can be seen as an attempt to better society from the speaker's perspective. It moderately adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly, adhering to this principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.