Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a legal opinion by Justice Thomas regarding the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's office in the context of the Trump v. U.S. case. It addresses a significant public issue related to the legal framework and the functioning of the justice system.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a legal analysis and does not contain inflammatory or harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a legal argument and its implications. It encourages readers to consider the constitutional basis of the Special Counsel's office. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the legal framework without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the legal issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by discussing a significant legal issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.