Matt Taibbi

The statement by @LetTheBirdDie constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, specifically the legal and constitutional implications of presidential powers and Supreme Court decisions. The tone is confrontational and critical, aiming to correct perceived misunderstandings about legal rulings and their implications.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. The confrontational tone and dismissive language ('You clearly don’t understand') can be seen as harmful and disrespectful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a dismissive and potentially belittling manner. It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the tone is harsh. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticizing the other person's understanding without fostering a constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue. It includes a personal attack ('You clearly don’t understand') and does not address the argument in a respectful manner. [-2]