Joe Biden

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 252

The statement and accompanying image are critical of Donald Trump, alleging that he set a record for the most lies told in a single debate. The image lists 50 statements attributed to Trump, labeling them as lies. The tone is accusatory and aims to discredit Trump by highlighting perceived falsehoods.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and image aim to hold Trump accountable for his words, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by exposing falsehoods. However, the accusatory tone may contribute to polarization.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and image do not respect the dignity of Trump, as they label him a liar without providing a balanced view or context. This can be seen as a form of public shaming. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The intent appears to be to promote understanding of Trump's alleged dishonesty, but the approach is confrontational rather than empathetic or compassionate. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement and image do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, they present a one-sided attack, which can be seen as a personal attack rather than a substantive critique. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against Trump, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment if the goal is to promote honesty in public discourse. However, the method is contentious. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the approach are questionable due to the lack of constructive dialogue and potential for increased division.