Don Lemon

Rank 29 of 47
Score 22

The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue, namely a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, and its implications for the political landscape. The statement also mentions an expert discussion, which suggests a substantive engagement with the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is neutral and informative. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by indicating an expert discussion on the topic, which can foster empathy and compassion through informed dialogue. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement suggests a constructive dialogue by involving an expert to break down the ruling, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing a significant legal ruling and its implications, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing information and expert analysis. [+2]