Julia Friedland
@JuliaFriedland
·
112d
The statement critiques President Biden's cognitive abilities and the media's role in covering up his alleged decline. It engages in public discourse by addressing the fitness of a public official for office and the media's integrity.
- The statement could be seen as harmful as it questions Biden's cognitive abilities without substantial evidence, potentially causing harm to his reputation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of President Biden, as it engages in a form of personal attack by questioning his cognitive abilities. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a direct personal attack on Biden's cognitive abilities and implies a media conspiracy without engaging in a reasoned debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, as it makes serious allegations without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.