In reply to:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
569d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the dynamics of political trust in media, particularly in the context of partisan reactions to media coverage and political figures. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical, suggesting that Democrats' increased trust in media post-2016 is illogical and influenced by opposition to Trump. The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does imply a lack of critical thinking among Democrats.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that a group is not thinking logically, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but does not fully respect the dignity of others by implying a lack of critical thinking. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the reasoning behind Democrats' trust in media. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the reasoning without providing a substantive argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.