Matt Taibbi

The statement by @dev1_patrick constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about funding investigative journalism, a public issue. The tone is critical but not hostile, and the intent is to challenge the feasibility of a proposed solution.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of an idea rather than a personal attack. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a dialogue that could lead to a better understanding of the issue.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the feasibility of the proposed solution without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]