Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement references a historical event involving a public figure, Joe Biden, and his past campaign tactics, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with the public issue of age in politics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could be seen as contributing to a potentially harmful narrative about age. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity to some extent, but it brings up past criticisms that could be seen as a form of indirect harassment or ageism. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it highlights a past personal attack, which could be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing historical context, but it could be more balanced in its presentation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.