Matt Taibbi

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of censorship by private companies and government influence, which is a significant societal and political concern. The tone is assertive and challenges the actions of private companies and government entities, suggesting a violation of free speech principles.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices and does not appear to intend harm, but the accusatory tone could contribute to divisiveness.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals but engages in a contentious debate that could be seen as confrontational.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes a perspective on free speech and government overreach, which can foster understanding of these issues, but it lacks empathy and compassion for opposing views. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack, particularly by calling someone a liar. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to address a significant societal issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for free speech. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech by challenging censorship but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone.