John Nelson
@Yukon_Hiker
·
563d
The statement critiques Kamala Harris's debate performance and her ability to connect with a mass audience, suggesting that her legal background is an asset in debates but that she struggles with broader appeal. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and it engages with public discourse by discussing the electability of a political figure in the context of a broader conversation about polling data and campaign performance.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm, but it does critique Harris's personal qualities, which could be seen as somewhat harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a personal critique that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques Harris's public persona and debate performance rather than her character. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.