Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by addressing political issues, specifically the actions of political candidates and law enforcement. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, with strong language used to criticize the actions of the police and the political candidates referred to as 'war criminals.' The statement also highlights the actions of Dr. Jill Stein in a positive light, suggesting she is a more suitable candidate for the presidency.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of 'war criminals' and 'genocide.' This could escalate tensions and contribute to a hostile environment. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals it criticizes, using derogatory terms like 'war criminals' and 'genocide Joe or Don.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards Dr. Jill Stein's actions but does so at the expense of others, which undermines the principle of promoting compassion universally. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather uses personal attacks and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of public concern (police actions and political candidates), but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.