Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Dr. Jill Stein constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to campaign funding and the actions of political entities. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, suggesting a perceived injustice and rallying support against it.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language that could incite anger or frustration among supporters. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations against 'the empire' and 'the Dems' without specific evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses divisive language and frames the situation as a battle against an enemy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political opponents. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally supporters against perceived injustice, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by fighting for fair treatment. However, the confrontational tone may undermine this goal. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes broad accusations without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.