The statement critiques the shift in journalistic standards from objectivity to a focus on social impact, arguing that trust in factual accuracy is essential for any positive impact. The tone is critical and analytical, questioning the rationale behind the change in journalistic approach.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a critique of journalistic practices rather than individuals, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the importance of trust and factual accuracy in journalism, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a journalistic trend without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of a platform by engaging in a substantive critique of journalistic practices, demonstrating integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.