Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Rep. Seth Moulton's political actions and questions the trustworthiness of Democrats in protecting democracy. It references a specific event and provides a link to a news article for context, indicating engagement with public issues and contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it does imply distrust towards a political group, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure and a political party.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and accusatory. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it questions the trustworthiness of Democrats broadly. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses a platform to raise a political issue, but it could be argued that it lacks responsibility and integrity by making broad generalizations.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.