The statement appears to be a critique of mainstream media coverage and a promotion of a political campaign's message. It addresses public issues such as media bias and political leadership, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the phrase 'two of the worst options for President this century' could be seen as harsh criticism. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures without naming them. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement claims to promote 'healing, peace, and prosperity,' which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the perceived shortcomings of the media and political options. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the campaign's influence to promote its message, which it claims is for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to communicate a political message responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.