Cornel West

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 226

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically critiquing an interview with President Biden and promoting a political campaign.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone is critical and could be seen as confrontational. It does not explicitly violate this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critique and political promotion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques a public figure's interview, which is a legitimate form of public discourse.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the speaker to promote a political campaign, which can be seen as an effort to better society through political engagement.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in political discourse.