Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to be a critique of an individual who is perceived to be insulated from public and professional pressure, possibly due to cognitive issues. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, suggesting that the individual is impervious to external influences.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by questioning the cognitive abilities of the individual, which may be considered insensitive and potentially harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual by implying cognitive impairment and insularity, which could be seen as a form of harassment or disrespect. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a critical and dismissive tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a personal attack by questioning the individual's cognitive abilities and insularity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.