Jill Stien

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 35

The statement questions the differences between Project 2025 and the GOP platform of the past three decades, while also criticizing the Democratic Party for not effectively countering it and for running a candidate who is trailing in the polls. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, aiming to provoke discussion on political strategy and effectiveness.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its confrontational tone could potentially provoke heated responses.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of political strategies and candidates but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to question and critique political strategies, which is a responsible use of public discourse. [+1]